|
Home |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Edmund Norman's Monthly Online Literary Magazine ~ August 2005 Issue No. 82 |
|
STEPHEN KING'S NEVER ENDING STORYby Tyler Hall As the
former Webmaster of The Dark Tower DOT net, one thing I’ve learned to do well
is gauge reader response to King’s work. The Dark Tower DOT net was, and still
is, the largest Stephen King community on the web. With everything that King
releases, my inbox is flooded with readers’ questions, comments, and
predictions about the story. Their letters poke at its secrets, tug at its
seams, and try to unravel the mystery that hums at the center of every King
story. I’ve learned that fans have an insatiable urge to share their thoughts
with other readers. A few times each week I’ll even get emails thanking me for
all the books I’ve written. For these, I usually write back and politely
explain that I am not Stephen King.
(I’ve collected quite a lot of these emails. I print each one and keep them in
a folder in the trunk of my car. They’ll make a good book one day.) Crazy
emails aside, most of the feedback I see is positive, and that shouldn’t be
surprising – this is a Stephen King website after all. Most people wouldn’t be
in the discussion if they weren’t fans to begin with. Still, the negative
comments do appear, and, when they do, they come in waves. The
first negative swing in King’s popularity that I witnessed came in 2002 with
the release of From a Buick 8. (I’m
sure there were others prior to this, but I didn’t begin keeping track until
1998.) It’s not that readers didn’t like the story – most of them did. It’s
that they didn’t know what to make of it. I attribute this reaction to bad
timing on the part of King and his publisher. Buick 8 was released amidst a flurry of revival in the In the
past, King had typically separated each Tower
book by five years. Fans came to expect and accept this. Good things come to
those who wait – or so the saying says. However, the fifth volume was overdue. Five
years had passed and there was still no sign from King that it would be on
store shelves anytime soon. To make matters worse, King had stirred up his Dark Tower fan-base a year earlier when
he and Peter Straub co-authored Black
House. For every question about the Tower
that the novel answered, it left just
as many unanswered. Also, fans were still reeling from King’s brush with death
in 1999. When the evening news reported that King had been struck and
critically injured by a speeding van near his home, the first thing many
readers thought of was “Oh no! Now we’ll never find out what happens to
Roland!” It was only after that thought had already crossed their minds that
they began to actually worry about King. How do I know this? I’m sorry to say
that I was one of the many to think of Roland’s well being before King’s. This
just goes to show the enormous hold that Roland and Mid-World have over King’s
readers. The Tower series was at the
front of their minds, and when King released From a Buick 8 with virtually no Tower connections in it, fans wanted more. They felt they deserved
more, and the emails and message boards showed this. Notice
I’m using the word “fan” to refer to King’s readers. It’s a very appropriate
word – a shortened form of “fanatic.” When an enormously popular writer like
King writes a series of four books – and promises three more – fans mistakenly
begin to believe that they have a bit of ownership in the story. They see
themselves as stockholders in a company. They buy the books, they read the
story, and they feel that King has a duty to not only finish the tale, but to
finish it the way they want it done. King wrote about this very situation –
albeit taken to the extreme – in Misery.
If you’ve read the book, or been following along with what I’ve said, then it
should be no surprise to learn that the biggest drop in King’s popularity – one
that dwarfed the dip caused by Buick 8
– came when fans finished the last Dark
Tower book and found that it didn’t end the way they wanted it to. What
they don’t realize though, is that King never once had a say in the ending. It
wasn’t up to him. The Dark Tower’s
never-ending ending is their own fault. For all the complaining, moaning, and
disappointment surrounding what Roland found at the top of the Tower – the fans
caused it, not King. To
understand why the series ended the way it did, we need to look back at the
moment when Roland’s fate was sealed. We need to step back and revisit Pere
Callahan sitting among the Manni at the end of Wolves of the Calla. Here is a man worn down and tired. We first
met him in a little town in In the
afterword of The Dark Tower, King
describes the word I’m about to use as a “smarmy academic term.” He hates it -
especially “the pretentiousness of it” (843). That word is metafiction, and I’m
going to risk King’s wrath and go on using it because it works so well to
describe the situation Callahan finds himself in. Webster’s Dictionary defines
the term as “fiction that deals, often playfully and self-referentially, with
the writing of fiction or its conventions.” Playfulness aside, it’s an apt
description. Callahan’s realization is a key turning point for the story. It
clues Roland in to the secret that has been eluding him for most of book five.
He realizes that not only is Callahan fictional, but they all are. He
understands that to succeed in his quest for the Tower, he’ll have to meet his
maker – Stephen King. This meeting, between storyteller and character, occurs
in the sixth volume, Song of Susannah,
and entrenches the series firmly into the realm of metafiction. But it doesn’t
stop there. The metafiction continues into the seventh book where Roland and
Jake encounter King again. The self-referential moments of these last three
books creates a sharp separation between them and the first four. When Callahan
sees his name among the characters of ‘Salems
Lot, it becomes clear that the last three volumes are one long finale –
separate from the rest of the series. Not only were they written back to back,
but the story of each picks up within hours of where the previous left off. This
is a huge change from how books one through four operated. The gap between them
varied from a few hours, to a few months, to a hundred years. When
King sat down to start work on the fifth book and begin his final push to
finish Roland’s tale, perhaps the separation from the previous books allowed
him to take the series in a different direction and incorporate the
metafictional plot elements that had been brewing inside of him. As strange a
twist as his appearance into the books might seem, he is hardly the first
author to experiment with metafiction. The postmodernists did it and so did
Cervantes (Don Quixote), Chaucer (Canterbury Tales), and even John Fowlles
(The French Lieutenant’s Woman).
However, I believe that King takes this style a bit further than anyone else.
He not only includes himself in the fiction but also implies that without the
fiction he wouldn’t exist at all. Roland
exists because King wrote a story in which Roland is a character. If King
hadn’t ever written The Dark Tower
series, then Roland would not exist. Like any character, their life is
dependent upon the author’s pen. The trick of the Tower series is that the converse is true also. King’s life is
dependent upon Roland. If King did not write Roland’s story, then King would
have died in 1999 when struck by Bryan Smith’s van. Roland and Jake save King’s
life and, in turn, allow King to finish writing their story. Neither author nor
character could exist without the other. Who, then, is the fiction? Roland?
King? Both? Neither? The line between what’s real and what’s only a story
becomes dangerously blurred. The dedication to book seven complicates things
even more. King writes He who speaks without an attentive ear
is mute. Therefore, Constant Reader, this final
book in the What King says is that, by itself, the act of
writing is not enough to bring a story to life. In order for the tale to come
alive, for its magic to persist, there must be a reader as well. This
relationship between reader and writer is what fuels the story’s never-ending
magic. Every time someone sits down with The
Gunslinger and reads its famous opening line, Roland steps out on his quest
once again. By the time they reach the seventh book and finish the series,
another reader has begun the quest anew. Roland has no choice but to repeat his
journey. And each time he loops, the story is altered slightly. Everyone reads
and interprets King’s writing differently. Some will see Roland as a villain,
while others may regard him as a flawed hero. It’s these differences in opinion
that cause his quest to vary each time. However, they’ll never be large enough
to completely change the ending. Because as long as there are fans anxiously
awaiting the next page of his journey, Roland will always have a Home |